Q&A on relations between processes of quality management and product realization
Part 1/2: Q&A with Mr. A
(Aug.5w,2005)

Mr. A: I would like to question on your article of gDoes a quality management system include product realization processes? Oct.4w, 2002h in Basic knowledge of ISO9001:2000 corner on your web-site.
I have summarized your thought by following three items. Are they correct?

1.

Quality management system (QMS) does not include product realization processes.

2. 8.2.3 should have been written monitoring and measurement of the product realization processes, instead of ones of QMS.
3. Monitoring and measurement of QMS should be done by internal audits.

The certification body to which my company has registration has said that processes which have to be monitored according to requirements in 8.2.3 clause include all processes mentioned in 4.1 clause. But in other part of 8.2.3 clause it also says g\\\ to ensure conformity of the producth. Confusing!


My answer: Your understanding of the article of mine is perfect with the three items. ISO9001:2000 is confusing with management activities and production process activities due to misapplication of PDCA model to management (refer to gA critical misapplication of the PDCA model: 2002, May.3wh in individual clauses relating ISO9001:2000 corner on this web-site).

Mr. A: If QMS does not include product realization processes, then I wonder what clause 7 is for.
In order to make relations of QMS and product realization processes clear, I often use cormorant fishing as a metaphor for both relations. In the case of a design section cormorants compare to engineers and a cormorant fisherman compares to its manager.
Does the clause 7 require things that cormorants have to observe by themselves or a cormorant fisherman should force to do to his or her cormorants?

My answer: A cormorant fisherman has several reins which hold cormorantsf each necks. ISO9001:2000 is the Standards for a cormorant fisherman, not for cormorants. A cormorant fisherman, handling reins, has to control fishing activities done by his or her cormorants.
Therefore there will be inevitably duplication of requirements of the clause 7 with 8.2.2. (Refer to gDuplication of monitoring of processes over internal audits: Jan.2w, 2004h in individual clause relating ISO9001:2000 corner on this web-site).
According to English etymology, gmanageh is to rein a horse. In this case a horse rider compares to a cormorant fisherman and a horse compares to a cormorant.

Mr. A: When I talked about the gcormorant fishingh model at my private meeting with engineers who are compared to cormorants, they raised a laugh.
In my company there was layoff of some engineers and the design section manager often has had to catch fishes in a river.

My answer: In a small business there will be frequently be a need to share duties and responsibilities. The merit of the status is that a manager can get actual understanding of product realization status. The demerit is that often a manager confuses management activities with product realization activities. In the above metaphor of cormorant fishing, problems are that a cormorant fisherman who sometimes catches fishes in river is apt to be unable to understand the basic different roles between a cormorant fisherman and cormorants and sometimes loose reins of some of them which lead to lack of management.

Mr. A: It is exactly the most important management problem confronting in my company.