| 1.「An assessor and auditee
are on equal terms」 |
| |
（The most important thing is fair assessment.）
|
| 2.「As professional assessors of us
will provide professional assessment services」 |
| |
（The key point is not professional, but what kind of profession
a assessor can provide. Is he or she professional for making heavy
documentation? Someone will be easy to force audtee to make wasteful
works on the name of profession. In fact so called veteran assessors
tend to do false assessments.）
|
| 3.「Assessment by using easy
technical words」 |
| |
・Avoiding difficult technical terms
（What are difficult words? If the body or assessors introduce
new words it means the body and assessors interpret the Standards
in their own way.）
・Avoiding assessment sequence as the Standards
（The Standards are based on PDCA cycle. So the sequence
of the Standards has significant meaning. To neglect the concept
will lead to assessments by interpretation of their own way.）
|
| 4.「Do conformity assessment
and no nonconformity by assessors’ personal opinions」 |
| |
（This declaration runs in clear contradiction to the declaration
3. above）
|
| 5.「” Healthy criticism” based on the third
party position」 |
| |
（What kind of criticism is healthy is not clear. Conformity
assessment by the third party is not criticism.）
|
| 6.「Provide an opportunity to enhance auditee’s
merits」 |
| |
（It means added-value assessment
and directly contradict with the declaration in 4 ( refer to
‘Still stick to “value-added
assessment :Apr.3w, 2004’ and “Assessment
is improvement? : Jan.4w, 2005” in Scenes of assessment
corner on this web-site).
|