Recently my neighborhood association passed
the bulletin on with a video tape. The bulletin referred to sorting
out our domestic trash. I soon saw the tape. At the beginning there
appeared the mayor of Yokohama city, Mr. Nakata, with casual style saying
his thanks for residentsf cooperation with sorting out our domestic
trash and its environmental effects.
After his speech the tape informed me how the sorted trash processed
to final various recycled products.
The mayor said, owing to the sorting, the recycle ratio of domestic
trash in the city has so highly improved that trash burned in the
cityfs incinerators has decreased by about thirty percent. Thus two
incinerators have become unnecessary and the replacement cost of the
facilities (about hundred billion yen) and the operation cost (about
three billion yen) have been saved. Moreover the carbon dioxide emitted
from the incinerators has become zero which equals to the effect by
newly planted several thousand of Japanese cedars among the city.
Among the residents there are many small business offices. Their trash
may be treated as same as domestic trash. Therefore Nakatafs thanks
for theses offices may be included.
For such small companies decreasing trash may be a very important
environmental objective in Yokohama city.
I think certification bodies which do not accept environmental objectives,
targets such as reduction of waste papers, trash and use of electricity
have no right to assess Mr. Nakatafs great work (refer to gFalse assessment
policy for ISO14001:2004 by the certification body A: Oct.4w, 2005h
and gTransition assessment of ISO14001:2004 of Company S: Nov.2w,
2005h in ISO14001 standard corner on this web-site)
The Mr. Nakatafs great work has showed environmental objectives,
targets such as reduction of trash is very important.
|